Wednesday, February 17, 2010

What ailed King Tut?

I admit that I am a bit of an Egyptophile (is this a word?). It was great fun to read “Ancestry and Pathology in King Tutankhamun’s Family”, in JAMA’s February 17 issue. King Tut, made famous by the Steve Martin song of the same name, was portrayed in tomb art (statues/reliefs/sculptures) as androgynous and having a “bizarre form of gynecomastia.”

The authors of the article examined several mummies thought to be related to Tutankhamun via radiological and genetic studies. They developed a family tree, and surprise, surprise, the Tutankhamun family intermarried. Turns out the boy king was the product of a brother sister relationship, and he in turn, likely married his sister. Tut’s apparent grandpappy, Amenhotep had a club foot,which he passed on to Tut. In addition, Tut’s father, the beleaguered Akhenaten, had a cleft palate, which Tut had too. Scoliosus ran rampant as well.

In addition, King Tut had evidence of Plasmodium falciparuminfection, as well as juvenile aseptic bone necrosis, and had may have had to use a cane for much of his life. Images of Tutankhamun frequently show him sitting during activities in which one would usually stand, like hunting. When Tut’s tomb was opened over 130 canes were found, showing signs of wear.

As for the bizarre body type seen it statuary and artistic renderings of the period? The authors found no evidence of inherited syndromes that would cause androgynous features and “bizarre” gynecomastia. The authors conclude that the artistic representations of Akenaten and Tutankhamun were likely stylized and idealized according to the wishes of the king.

The great thing is, the boy king is not likely to sue if the authors are wrong!

Photo

Tags: ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails